BENEDICTHUGHESCMRI
Redaktor "The Reign of Mary"
Anyone who wished to notice saw the forecast of misfortune. The Modernists, residing in the Vatican since the death of His Holiness Pope Pius XII, do not care about the Latin Tridentine Mass. It is disgusting to them. Soon after the end of Vatican II , Paul VI imposed the "New Order" of Mass on the faithful, much to the dismay of the millions of devout Catholics who saw it for what it was - a Protestant "Lord's Supper" service.
Even an outstanding theological study - known as "The Ottavian Intervention" - was unable to stop Paul VI from intending to replace the Tridentine Mass with his Novus Ordo Missae . Cardinal Ottaviani noted that the new Mass was completely devoid of any reference to the Mass as a sin offering. Indeed, according to this distinguished cardinal, the Novus Ordo Missae "both in its entirety and in detail represent a striking departure from the Catholic theology of the Mass as formulated at the XXII session of the Council of Trent."
Before I list the general information contained in the Francis-Bergoglio Traditionis custodes of July 16, 2021 - invalidating the motu proprio of Benedict XVI Summorum Pontificum of 2007 - I would like to briefly summarize the history of implementing the Novus Ordo over the last 50 years. First, the Novus Ordo Missae was promulgated by Paul VI in 1969 and became effective in 1970, replacing the venerable Latin Mass of the Holy Sacrifice known as the Tridentine Mass.
Then, in 1971, Paul VI issued an instruction authorizing elderly and infirm priests, with the consent of their bishops, to say the Tridentine Mass, provided that it was without the participation of the faithful. In this permission it is easy to see the usual tolerance of the real Mass. by senior priests who will soon die anyway. The fact that the faithful were not allowed to attend these Masses was a cruel rebuke to the traditionalist-minded believers who wanted the real Mass again. Then, in an audience in 1976, Paul VI made his intentions very clear: "The adoption of the new Ordo Missae it is certainly not left to the free choice of priests or faithful ... the new Order was promulgated to take the place of the old one, after mature reflection, as demanded by the Second Vatican Council. "The attitude and behavior of Paul VI clearly indicate that he desired the Tridentine Mass went down in history and completely stopped being celebrated.
Then, in 1988, Archbishop Lefebvre announced his intention to ordain four priests from his fraternity as bishops. To dissuade him from this step, John Paul II sent "Cardinal" Joseph Ratzinger to meet with Archbishop. Lefebvre at his seminary in Switzerland. And although the archbishop initially agreed to renounce the intended consecration - by signing a memorandum of understanding on May 5 - the next morning he withdrew his consent and continued his efforts to consecrate the bishops. Following his consecration, John Paul II immediately excommunicated Archbishop Lefebvre and the bishops he had consecrated.
It was the action of their "pope" that prompted a group of priests from the Society of St. Pius X to break with the brotherhood. They asked John Paul II if he would allow them to have their own fraternity, under his supposed authority, with permission to celebrate the traditional Latin Mass. In this way, John Paul II created the Society of St. Peter, trying to keep in the conciliar church those Catholics who wanted the traditional liturgy. Several other smaller groups, also within the structure of the Conciliar Church, have also obtained permission to say the Latin Mass.
Now let's jump quickly to 2005. The aforementioned Joseph Ratzinger was elected the successor of John Paul II, taking the name of "Pope" Benedict XVI. Ratzinger always regretted that he had failed to reconcile with Archbishop Lefebvre and his brotherhood. Accordingly, on July 7, 2007, he issued the motu proprio Summorum Pontificum , which allowed any priest to say the Tridentine Mass, even without the consent of the local bishop. This document caused such consternation among the Novus Ordo bishops that soon after him Benedict XVI wrote to them explaining the reasons for granting this permission. It was clear from his letter that it was primarily an attempt to encourage SSPX members to return to full communion with the Conciliar Church.
Many semi-traditionalists considered this to be a great turn of events, a kind of triumph, answer to prayer, etc. In contrast, we - who had long ago concluded that the Holy See was vacant - had a completely different view of Summorum Pontificum . First, Benedict XVI put forward the absurd thesis that the Novus Ordo and the Tridentine Mass are actually the same rite! He declared the Novus Ordo Missae to be the ordinary form of the Roman Rite, while the Tridentine Mass is the extraordinary form (thus relegating the real Mass to the "adoptive sister" of the disgusting Novus Ordo). He also stated that no one could use the permission granted in this document if he contested the legitimacy of the Second Vatican Council or the Novus Ordo. Moreover, this approval to celebrate the Tridentine Mass was another futile effort on his part to establish a "hermeneutic of continuity" - an attempt to prove that the Vatican II Conciliar Church was in fact a continuation of the pre- Vatican II Catholic Church .
Now even this tolerance for the Tridentine Mass in the Conciliar Church has been shattered by Francis-Bergoglio with a stroke of the pen. By issuing his motu proprio Traditionis custodes on July 16, Bergoglio completely nullified the effects of Summorum Pontificum . This was certainly no surprise. During his eight-and-a-half-year "pontificate", Francis-Bergoglio showed many signs of his contempt for the traditional liturgy of the Catholic Church. In fact, it was only a matter of time. One of the two had to be removed. A real Mass, celebrated under the auspices of the Conciliar Church, was just as inappropriate as a Catholic priest wanting to say a real Mass in Cranmer's time in England during the Reformation. It could no longer be tolerated.
So what exactly does this document contain? Here is a quick summary of the main points in the Novus Ordo Watch article on this topic :
- There is no longer any ordinary or extraordinary form - the Novus Ordo Missae of Paul VI is "the only expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite."
- Only a diocesan bishop can regulate the liturgical celebrations in his diocese.
- The diocesan bishop is responsible for determining whether any group of the Latin Mass in his diocese is in conflict with the validity or legality of the Novus Ordo Missae.
- The diocesan bishop designates specific places where the participants of the Latin Mass can gather for the "Eucharistic celebration" - it cannot take place in "parish churches" and new "personal parishes" cannot be established.
- In these places, the diocesan bishop should establish specific days on which the traditional Latin Mass may be celebrated.
- When it is celebrated, the readings (Epistle, Gospel) of the Latin Mass must be read in the local language (ie, English, Italian, etc.) in a translation approved for liturgical use by the relevant episcopal conference.
- The diocesan bishop should designate an appropriate priest who is entrusted not only with the celebration of Holy Mass. traditional, but also pastoral care for the faithful who participate in it. He should be "animated by a living pastoral love and a sense of ecclesial communion" and should surround these people with spiritual care.
- No new communities or groups of the Latin Mass are to be founded.
- Priests who wish to celebrate the Traditional Mass after the publication of this document must seek permission from their bishop, who must first consult the Holy See before giving it.
- Priests who are currently using the 1962 Missal must seek permission from the local bishop to continue the practice.
- Anything that contradicts this new Motu Proprio, Francis hereby repeals, regardless of the importance of these earlier ordinances.
- The new document takes effect immediately.
One can only imagine the consternation of those semi-traditionalists who want "to eat and have a cookie at the same time." In other words, they want the Latin Tridentine Mass (which is the legacy of the true Catholic Church) while remaining part of the Conciliar Church with its false popes and Protestant liturgy. How ironic is the title of Francis-Bergoglio's journal. Traditionis custodes translates as "keepers of tradition"! What an insult to pretend to be faithful to tradition while trying to destroy the true Mass. What a mockery!
Let us pray that this pseudo-Apostolic letter from Antipope Francis-Bergoglio will finally lead those who cultivate a love of the true Holy Mass to recognize this false Church of Vatican II as it is. It is not the same Church that was shared by the apostles, saints and martyrs our forefathers. Let us remain, like them, always faithful to the faith of our Fathers, to the faith that contains and protects the holy sacrifice of the Mass.
Ks. Benedict Hughes CMRI
Article from The Reign of Mary, No. 181, Summer 2021 ( www.cmri.org ) (2)
Mirosław Salawa translated from English
(Most of the illustrations from the editor. Ultra montes )
–––––––––––––––
Footnotes:
(1) Tytuł oryginalny: Vatican Ends Toleration of the True Mass. Reflections on the Motu Proprio decree "Traditionis Custodes".
(2) Por. 1) Ks. Benedict Hughes CMRI, a) Sedewakantyzm: jedyny logiczny wniosek. b) Farsa Vaticanum II. Rzetelna ocena soboru po pięćdziesięciu latach. c) Nowa praktyka "dialogu". Duch apostolski zniszczony przez Vaticanum II. d) Pożegnalne słowa do swoich kapłanów. O spuściźnie Benedykta XVI. e) New Age, Nowa Religia. f) Konieczność modlitwy o nawrócenie zbłąkanych dusz. g) Karmić dusze nauką prawdy. h) Papież Pius XII – w pięćdziesiątą rocznicę śmierci. i) "...ale nas zbaw ode złego...". Czy modernistyczny kościół jest w stanie wyrzucić diabła? j) Franciszek-Bergoglio znowu atakuje! Pokaz dwulicowości Vaticanum II. k) Największa ozdoba katolickiego kapłaństwa. l) Cała i nieskalana. Musimy zachować integralność wiary katolickiej. m) Korzenie problemów: Vigano dotyka źródła posoborowych błędów. n) Kult Czternastu Świętych Wspomożycieli. o) Moralne bankructwo modernistycznego neokościoła. p) Religia islamu: zagrożenie dla zachodniej cywilizacji. q) Nieuniknione podziały na widoku publicznym. "Dobrzy funkcjonariusze" kontra "źli funkcjonariusze" w soborowym kościele.
2) Bp Mark A. Pivarunas CMRI, a) Sedewakantyzm. b) Odpowiedzi na zarzuty wobec stanowiska sedewakantystycznego. c) Fatima, negocjacje FSSPX z modernistami i stanowisko arcybiskupa Lefebvre. d) Nieomylne nauczanie papieża Piusa XII i Jego świątobliwych poprzedników potępia błędy i herezje Vaticanum II. e) Odstępstwo Campos i nielogiczne stanowisko teologiczne FSSPX. f) Pięćdziesiąt lat "Nowej Mszy" w modernistycznym Neokościele. g) Nieomylność katolickiego Kościoła.
3) Ks. Noël Barbara, a) Papieska nieomylność a dzisiejszy kryzys w Kościele. b) Ecône – koniec, kropka. c) List otwarty do członków Bractwa Św. Piusa X (FSSPX). d) Uderzające podobieństwo reform Pawła VI do reformy anglikańskiej 1549 roku. e) Katolicka Msza święta a Novus Ordo Missae. Czy NOM jest ważną mszą? f) Czy Jan Paweł II jest modernistą? g) Zdemaskowanie braku autorytetu władzy Neokościoła.
4) Mario Derksen, a) Habemus Bergoglio. Antypapież Franciszek i soborowy kościół. b) "Jako owce, nie mające pasterza". Sześćdziesiąt lat Sede vacante. Referat wygłoszony na Konferencji Fatimskiej.
5) Jérôme Bourbon, a) Paweł VI: święty w niebie czy pachołek piekła? b) "Synod o rodzinie": błogosławieństwo udzielone cudzołóstwu! c) Pięćdziesiąt lat "nowej mszy": półwiecze kataklizmu.
6) Patrick Henry Omlor, a) Zbójecki Kościół. b) Jan Paweł II Apostata. c) Anna Katarzyna Emmerich o "nowym kościele".
7) Ks. Rama P. Coomaraswamy, a) Posoborowi "papieże". b) Problemy z nowymi sakramentami. c) Jurysdykcja. Część I. d) Jurysdykcja. Część II (dodatkowe uwagi). e) Katolicyzm laissez faire. f) Posłuszeństwo. g) Autorzy Nowej Mszy. h) Czy te rzeczy zostały przepowiedziane? i) Obrona sedewakantyzmu. j) Ruch zielonoświątkowy: przejawem i uzewnętrznieniem "nowego kościoła". k) Bractwo Św. Piusa X, fałszywe rozwiązanie rzeczywistego problemu. l) Czy księża z Bractwa Św. Piotra są prawdziwymi kapłanami? m) Sedewakantyzm (polemika z duetem Gruner-Ferrara). n) Kilka refleksji z wizyty w Rzymie na temat Novus Ordo Missae oraz posłuszeństwa Janowi Pawłowi II. o) Vaticanum II.
8) Ks. Anthony Cekada, a) Tradycjonaliści, nieomylność i Papież. b) Czy ekskomunikowany kardynał może zostać wybrany na papieża? c) Bergoglio nie ma nic do stracenia... zatem sedewakantystyczna argumentacja musi się zmienić. d) Msza w jedności z "piratem-«papieżem»": kilka zagadnień. e) "Stanowisko Bractwa" jako surogat Magisterium. f) Pułapka mszy Motu proprio. g) Wyznanie modernistycznej herezji pseudopapieża bałwochwalcy ("Papa Pachamama"). h) Witajcie na tradycyjnej, łacińskiej Mszy świętej.
9) Ks. Dr Mikołaj Gihr, Ofiara Mszy świętej. Wykład dogmatyczny, liturgiczny i ascetyczny dla duchowieństwa i świeckich.
10) S. Leonia, Niepokalanka, Czym jest Msza św. dla dusz naszych.
11) O. G. Lefebvre, Benedyktyn, Mszał Rzymski z dodaniem nabożeństw nieszpornych (1956 r.).
12) Ks. Antoni Nojszewski, Profesor liturgii w Seminarium lubelskim, Liturgia rzymska.
13) Abp Romuald Jałbrzykowski, U źródeł sakramentalnych łaski i miłości Bożej.
14) Wingolf, Czemu jestem katolikiem? Kilka słów o modernizmie.
15) Kongregacja Św. Inkwizycji, Wyznanie Wiary dla heretyków przechodzących na łono Kościoła katolickiego.
16) Bp Konrad Martin, a) O konieczności Chrztu świętego. b) Dogmat Zmartwychwstania. c) Katolicka nauka wiary. d) Katolicka nauka obyczajów. e) Wyznanie wiary (professio fidei).
17) Ks. Włodzimierz Piątkiewicz SI, Mistyczne Ciało Chrystusa a charaktery sakramentalne. Studium dogmatyczne.
18) Ks. Maciej Józef Scheeben, Tajemnice chrześcijaństwa. Tajemnica Kościoła i jego sakramentów.
19) Ks. Jan Rosiak SI, a) Chrystus mistyczny. b) Idąc nauczajcie. c) Wiara i "doświadczenie religijne". d) Tu es Petrus. e) "Poza Kościołem nie ma zbawienia".
20) Fr. Aleksander Lakszyński, Freemasonry and Carbonarism towards common mind and society according to the own words of the freemasons, and in this work of the cited and at the end of the unquestionable sources.
(Footnotes from ed. Ultra montes ).
https://ultramontes.pl/hughes_watykan_konczy_z_tolerancja.htm
