THE CRUX
So we come back to the question with which we began. And since we are not privileged to receive the revelations that enable so many “conservatives” to know precisely what is going to happen, we have to reason as best we can from the scanty and sometimes ambiguous evidence available to us. That evidence necessarily deals with the present, not some hypothetical future for which we may wish. I do hope most sincerely that our race has latent energies and a will-to-live that is only temporarily in abeyance, but that does not alter the fact that today the United States is not a nation. As Professor Andrew Hacker of Cornell pointed out in The End of the American Era twelve years ago, the United States has become a geographical area inhabited by incompatible races and in which our race has been splintered into reciprocally antagonistic groups, each of which tries to profit at the expense of the others. It may be that we can become a nation once more, but the toughest minds today will quail before a reasonable estimate of what that will cost in personal sacrifice, violence, and bloodshed.
In the meantime, Americans who may be distressed by the ever increasing industrial supremacy of Japan can do nothing about it. They cannot try to compete: the gangsters who operate labor unions have us by the throat; in addition, the revolutionary government in Washington has crippled industry and all business by compelling managements to replace Americans with lazy and feckless bums from the sacrosanct “minorities” who hate us; and finally our whole economy is being slowly crushed by the ever increasing cost of speeding up the importation and proliferation of every species of our anthropoid parasites. Americans cannot try to destroy Japanese industry by war: even now we are afflicted with mobs of hysterical neurotics who scream with indignation because neutrons cause fission in lithium deuteride. We cannot hide behind tariff barriers: neither the powerful international corporations, once American, nor the gang of counterfeiters called international finance would permit it, and if they were somehow overruled, our worm-eaten economic structure would crumble to dust — and in any case, so long as there are purchasers, they will prefer the superior Japanese product, even at a higher price. We are helpless. We have made ourselves helpless.
The initiative, therefore, lies with the Jews. Will they order action against Japan to keep their American cattle sufficiently prosperous to finance their terrorism throughout the world and also furnish rich nourishment to the hordes that have swarmed into the country that once was ours? I wish I knew the answer.
It may be that we err when we think of the Jewish race as only materialists, predatory for profit. We think of cut-throat methods and dirty tricks to take over the businesses of goyim and drive them from the professions, of political corruption and lucrative incitement of depravity. We think of the habitual device used in its simplest form by the parasites who swarmed into the South in the wake of the invading armies in 1865. It was neatly described by Mark Twain. As soon as the ruined plantations were made productive again, a store was promptly established by “a thrifty Israelite, who encourages the thoughtless negro and his wife to buy all sorts of things they could do without — buy on credit, at big prices, month after month, credit based on the negro’s share of the growing crop; and at the end of the season, the negro’s share belongs to the Israelite, and the negro is in debt besides.” It is always the same: in Rumania, in Hungary, in Poland, in every country infested by the international race. Of course, the simple method that suffices for Congoids and simple-minded peasants has to be made more elaborate and sophisticated when applied to prosperous Aryans, including millionaires, but the principle remains the same. Where there is blood to be sucked from the natives, the leeches are always fat.
That picture of the invading hordes is accurate so far as it goes, but it may not be complete. A race is more than an aggregation of individuals, and it is as much a spiritual as a physical entity. And there are historical incidents in which the spiritual force of Judaism has unmistakably overcome the selfish interests of individuals. A famous example is an event in A.D. 117, which was summarized in Ralph Perier’s little booklet, The Jews Love Christianity:
In the capital city [Cyrene] of that prosperous province [Cyrenaica] of the Roman Empire, the Jews, naturally, had planted a huge ghetto and they undoubtedly controlled a large part of the trade on which the province’s prosperity depended. Many Jews must have been among the wealthiest inhabitants, But, nevertheless, the race’s innate nihilism was excited by a christ, who announced the glad tidings that Yahweh had said that the time had come to put the goyim in their place. Filled with a zeal for righteousness, the Jewish swarm caught the stupidly complacent Greeks and Romans off their guard and slaughtered more than 200,000 men and women in various ingenious ways… God’s People then destroyed all the property in the city (including their own!), apparently by burning the city and then levelling to the ground such walls as remained standing. They then rushed out into the countryside to destroy the villages and uproot the crops.
I italicized the significant phrase. We do not know whether the wealthy Jews whose riches were thus annihilated were overmastered by the mob or had themselves caught the enthusiasm for ripping the guts out of people whose civilization and culture the race has always hated, but what is more significant is that every one of the Jewish rabble, even the very poorest, must have had to abandon and sacrifice his possessions, however few they may have been, when he and his fellows were inflamed by a spiritual ardor.
A race’s innate character is most clearly shown in its favorite myths. No reader of the “Old Testament” can have failed to notice that while there are many tales of highly profitable theft, subversion, and looting by God’s Chosen Bandits, the real Leitmotiv of the whole collection is destruction, universal massacres and total destruction. There is the well-known passage (Exod. 23.27) in which Yahweh promises each and every Jew that he “will destroy all the people to whom thou shalt come. {note 28} The words that I have quoted from the King James Version are attenuated in later translations on the basis of quibbles about the Hebrew text that are not worth mentioning. Very significant, however, is the meaning of the Hebrew text that was current in the first century B.C. and was translated into Greek in the Septuagint. In it the crucial words are [greek characters not reproduced here], and thus Yahweh promises “I will befuddle the minds of all the gentiles [=goyim].” This text agrees with the rest of the chapter, in which Yahweh explains that the hated races are not to be exterminated all at once, but gradually and “little by little.” That, in turn, fully agrees with the explanation given by Philo Judaeus, the Jews’ great apologist of the First Century (A.D.). Admitting that the tales about the conquest of Canaan were intrinsically unbelievable, he gave a rational explanation of them (Hypoth. 6.6-7 = 356d-357a). When the wandering tribe of Jews reached Canaan, intending to slaughter the natives and take their country from them, the Jews were necessarily incapable of armed aggression against a strong nation, but the Canaanites were so befuddled that they believed their implacable enemies to be a godly and peaceful folk and accordingly invited the Jews into their country and permitted them to set up their synagogues and colonies. That proves that the Jews are God’s People, because God must have made the Canaanites so stupid as to let the Jews immigrate. Of course, when the Jews had securely lodged themselves in the country they intended to steal, they destroyed the gullible goyim by methods, doubtless including their habitual technique of subversion and inciting civil discord and war, that Philo thought it would be tactless to describe. We may be virtually certain, therefore, that the Septuagint preserves the meaning of the original text, although later tales in the collection lovingly describe a military invasion of Canaan and the delights of slaughtering its inhabitants. One Jewish hoax that long imposed on our people was the claim that they sedulously preserved the texts of their holy books without alteration — that was, of course, definitively exposed by the few Dead Sea Scrolls that have been published, and is probably one reason why the Jews, with, of course, the complicity of the Christians, have made certain that the great bulk of those scrolls will never be read by honest goyim. (The story now is that a mysterious infection has attacked the organic fibers of the scrolls and is turning them into gelatin, so they are now said to be locked up in lightless vaults and one of the “custodians” has boasted that no one will ever again see them.) {end note 28} And the story narrates, over and over again, with wearisome iteration, the triumphs of the blood-thirsty and nihilistic marauders. Yahweh’s special pet, Moses, boasts, “And we took all the cities [of Bashan]… threescore cities… and we utterly destroyed them… utterly destroying the men, women, and children of every city.” And although Moses didn’t get to enjoy much more carnage, the savage swarm moved on to Jericho, “And they utterly destroyed all that was in that city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox and sheep and ass, with the edge of the sword… and they burnt the city with fire, and all that was therein.” “And Joshua {note 29} The King James Version (and, so far as I have noticed, all others in English) is in error here. The name of the supposed leader of the Jewish invasion and despoliation of Canaan should be spelled ‘Jesus’ since that is the spelling of the same name when it refers to the protagonist of the “New Testament.” The name is the Hebrew YSW, and since vowels were not written in Hebrew, it was easy to deceive persons who did not know Hebrew or the language from which that dialect was derived by supplying different vowels in the two contexts. In the last centuries B.C. and early centuries A.D. the name was pronounced as Yeshua or Yeshwa, which, as filtered through Greek and Latin, gives the English ‘Jesus.’ Of this, there can be no possible doubt: in the Septuagint the character whom ignorant Christians call ‘Joshua’ is uniformly called ‘Jesus,’ and the book that is called ‘Joshua’ in the Christians’ Bible is entitled ‘Jesus.’ The fact that there was only the one name is admitted by Christian theologians, but they maintain the false distinction for business reasons. {end note 29}… utterly destroyed all the inhabitants of Ai… And Joshua burnt Ai, and made it a heap for ever, even a desolation unto this day.” And so the inspiring tale goes on and on and on. “So Joshua smote all the country of the hills, and of the south, and of the vales, and of the springs, and all their kings: he left none remaining, but utterly destroyed all that breathed.” A righteous lust to kill all the men, all the women, all the children, all the animals, everything that breathed, and to destroy cities and make of them mounds of desolation in a desert, was stronger even than the greed of the godly brigands whose piety is celebrated in their exemplary tales.
Their “prophets” attain a memorable eloquence when they are inspired by visions of world-wide death and desolation. “The indignation of the Lord is upon all nations; …he hath utterly destroyed them, he hath delivered them to the slaughter. Their slain shall be cast out, and their stink shall come out of their carcasses, and the mountains shall be melted [!] with their blood. And all the host of heaven [i.e., the constellations] shall be dissolved, and the heavens shall be rolled together as a scroll.” — “Their land shall be soaked with blood, and their dust made fat with fatness [of decaying flesh]… And the streams thereof shall be turned into pitch, and the dust thereof into brimstone, and the land thereof shall become burning pitch. It shall not be quenched night or day; the smoke thereof shall go up forever: from generation to generation it shall lie waste; none shall pass through it for ever and ever.” — “I will break in pieces the horse and his rider… I will break in pieces the chariot and its rider… I will break in pieces man and woman… I will break in pieces old and young… I will break in pieces the young man and the maid… I will break in pieces the shepherd and his flock… I will break in pieces the husbandman and his yoke of oxen… I will break in pieces captains and rulers… And the land shall tremble and sorrow: for every purpose of the Lord shall be performed… to make the land of Babylon a desolation without an inhabitant.” — “I [Yahweh] have cut off the nations: their towers are desolate; I have made their streets waste, that none passeth by; their cities are destroyed, so that there is no man, that there is no inhabitant… My determination is to gather the nations, that I may assemble the kingdoms, to pour upon them mine indignation, even all my fierce anger: for all the earth shall be destroyed with the fire of my jealousy.”
The same spiritual Leitmotiv of Judaism appears vividly in the apocalypse that was selected for inclusion in the “New Testament.” It would take too long to enumerate the ingenious ways in which Jesus afflicts, tortures, and kills all the inhabitants of the earth, and every reader of that mad phantasmagoria will remember that Jesus, in a paroxysm of nihilistic fury, destroys the mountains and the seas, destroys the whole earth, destroys the sun and the moon, destroys all the stars — destroys the whole universe, destroys everything, destroys and destroys.
No other mythology so reeks of an insane lust to torture, to kill, to destroy, to create only desolation and nothingness. And this spiritual force has characterized the activities of the Jews throughout history: they can only destroy. And a few Jews to whom we should be profoundly grateful, notably Marcus Eli Ravage, Oscar Levy, and Maurice Samuel, have been so candid as to tell us the truth explicitly: “We are intruders, we are subverters.” — “We Jews… are today nothing else but the world’s seducers, its destroyers, its incendiaries, its executioners.” — “We Jews, we the destroyers, will remain destroyers forever.” {note 30} The passages from which I have taken these sentences are more in his article fully quoted, with bibliographic references, by Colonel Farrell in the March issue of The Liberty Bell, p. 31. {end note 30}
This is a cardinal fact that we must take into account in our estimates of the present. It is obvious that the Jews derive great profits from many forms of subversion — from pornography and the incitement of degeneracy, from class warfare, from wars between nations of our race, from the inflation of counterfeit currencies and the impoverishment of our people, and from many similar activities. {note 31} This includes, of course, the instigation of destructive lusts in the natives. Malcolm Muggeridge, writing in Time, 3 December 1979, proposed an explanation of the intensive campaign in our schools and newspapers to spread the race-destroying plague of homosexuality. His explanation merits consideration. He believes that John Maynard Keynes, for example, incensed by the loss of the ministrations of a favorite pervert, took vengeance on society “by inventing an economic theory which, after a period of spurious prosperity, must infallibly bankrupt the countries which adopt it.” The article is accompanied by a photograph which reminds us that Keynes can have been only partly an Englishman; I do not know whether or not the non-Aryan race that entered into his composition was Jewish, but it is well known that intelligent mongrels usually feel a bitter rancor against the society that made them possible. Muggeridge by implication also accuses E.M. Forster and Lytton Strachey of the same social incendiarism, but, so far as I know, they and the other noted homosexuals whom he mentions were of uncontaminated English descent. {end note 31} But if we consider such things from the standpoint of the race, not from the standpoint of the individual Jew who battens on us, is it not likely that the material profit counts for much less than the spiritual satisfaction? And if we consider some of the Jews’ work, I cannot see how it could conceivably yield a net profit. What monetary gain can they have obtained, or intended to obtain, by spending vast sums to incite the niggers to rape, murder, and arson? What profit from destroying civilization in Rhodesia and making that land again a land of savages? What can the Jews in South Africa gain in material terms from their present intensive effort to destroy the white population and make of that country another Rhodesia? Is it not obvious that they could squeeze much more money out of the White population by peaceful parasitism and without inciting the racial hatreds that disrupt the economy and could conceivably bring retribution upon themselves? The only explanation, it seems to me, is that with their race as a whole spiritual considerations are paramount, paramount over profit and even over self-preservation. One can foresee the logical end in a future that may not be too distant: one can see the last Jews dying with exultation on the surface of a planet from which they have exterminated all other human beings, all animals, all vegetation, all life — a planet of which they have made “a desolation of desolations.”
If this analysis of the Jews’ racial instinct is correct, it answers our initial question. It is most unlikely that the Jews will wish to abate the growing industrial supremacy of Japan so long as its effect is to weaken us, induce economic prostration, and accelerate our race’s already vertiginous progress to extinction.
+++End of The Yellow Perill+++
http://www.faem.com/oliver/yellow.htm
