THE CHINESE PUZZLE
A projection of Japan’s future must include some estimate of the likelihood that she can obtain control of the enormous masses of China. I shall not hazard a guess about what she may eventually accomplish, if she survives for four or five decades. Even the present status of China is sufficiently uncertain. We must also consider the possibility that China, which has been equipped with an arsenal of nuclear weapons by persons, thought to be Chinese, who were trained in the United States for that purpose, could be mobilized to join the Soviets in an attack on Japan, should the latter’s growing industrial supremacy alarm the powers that decide such matters.
Unlike Japan, China is a land in which there is abundant evidence of deep penetration by Jewish contingents over the past two thousand years, and there is every reason to believe that the Jews are today far more numerous and powerful than the report in the Daily Telegraph about the Jews in Kaifeng would suggest. Itsvàn Bakony in a little booklet, Chinese Communism and Chinese Jews {note 24} This is a booklet in the series, “Library of Political Secrets” cited above, as is the booklet by Bielsky that I shall shortly mention. I refer to these booklets, in preference to more elaborate sources, because they are so generally and inexpensively available. {end note 24} has conveniently assembled, from official Jewish publications in English and Spanish, some of the evidence of continued infiltration of China since the first century B.C. For example, a contingent of Jews arrived to join their fellow tribesmen in the Twelfth Century, and thereafter, at least, the Jews in China prospered mightily. It is a reasonable supposition that, as is the habit of their race, they spread subversion and had some part in the revolt that established the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644), under which Jews climbed to high offices in the Imperial Government, holding positions as commanders of armies, governors of provinces, and Prime Ministers. They were frequently reinforced by fresh bands of God’s Pets, chiefly from their large colonies in Persia and India, and we may be sure they played their part in the almost total corruption of government and demoralization of the native population that led to the collapse of the Ming Dynasty.
In the early days of the Ch’ing (Manchu) Dynasty, which ruled China from 1644 to 1912, the more prominent Jews scuttled to Shanghai and Hong Kong, where they were protected by the simple-minded British and speedily acquired a virtual monopoly of the trade in cotton and opium. Since the Manchus seem to have felt no veneration for the international race, it is a fair inference that the Jews who had been established in China long enough to acquire Mongolian features and Chinese names found it profitable to masquerade as Chinese and make a secret of their tribal organization. Many of the Manchu Emperors tried to check the corruption of the nation they ruled, and everyone knows that Great Britain declared war on China in 1839 to compel the Emperor to permit the importation and sale of opium for the profit of Jews who had embedded their mandibles in Britain and India, including the famous and wealthy family of the Sassoons. Their seemingly Mongolian kinsmen in China doubtless shared in the loot. Another assault on China in 1856 was necessary, however, to remove the last obstacles to the importation of opium and Christianity. The latter was of no great consequence and seems to have been used primarily to make superstitious English women simper in anticipation of meeting hordes of Mongolians in Heaven, thus neatly preventing Englishmen from questioning the morality of a war to force a whole nation to become addicted to a poisonous narcotic. Thousands of missionaries, both Catholic and Protestant, overran China but were able to talk or bribe only a comparatively few Chinese into “conversion.” Some observers have estimated that at any one time only some 18,000 Mongolian souls were ready for dispatch to Jesus.
The two Opium Wars raise a crucial, but unfortunately unanswerable, question. Did the Jews use their British troops to force opium on China merely for profit, or did they derive a spiritual joy from making even Mongolian goyim addicts of an expensive drug that both paralyses the mind and will and ruins so many victims economically that all but the wealthy must resort to crimes of violence to meet the expense of stupefying themselves? It is true, of course, that in all societies disintegrated by an increasing rate of crime, as in the United States, the result is highly profitable to parasites, but if we knew the answer to the psychological problem, we could predict with some confidence our immediate future.
Large contingents of Jews continued to arrive in China after 1856, but Bakony notes especially the power of the Soong family of Jewish bankers, who had acquired the outward appearance of Chinese. One of the daughters married Dr. Sun Yat-sen, while another married Chiang Kai-shek. Both of these female firebrands look like Chinese and were graduated from Wellesley College in the United States. Although Bakony does not say so, anyone who inspects a good photograph of Sun Yat-sen will see that the man was not a pure Mongolian, and will suspect that the other side of his heredity went back to Abraham. However that may be, Sun Yat-sen sweated at every pore ideals taken from Karl Marx, and whatever his intentions may have been, his subversion of the Chinese Monarchy initiated half a century of civil war and anarchy during which the Chinese population was the prey of an almost endless succession of enterprising bandits who called themselves “war lords” and repeatedly devastated every region of China not under Western Rule.
One of the most successful of the “war lords” was Chiang Kai-shek, who looked like, and may have been, a real Mongolian and seems throughout his life to have been directed by his wife, Soong Mai-ling. After he broke with the Communists, he proved himself a competent general and eventually ruled most of China until the Americans, with the treachery for which they are now famous, betrayed him to the Soviet-controlled Communists and he barely escaped to set up a government in exile on the island of Formosa, often called Taiwan.
Needless to say, the rulers of the United States, having skillfully arranged to deliver mainland China to the Communists and established a dissident régime on Formosa, thus obtained an almost endless supply of “problems” to distract the minds of their tax-paying serfs and to provide entertainment in the great vaudeville show at Forty-fifth Street and East River, commonly called the United Nations. Good shepherds know how to herd and fleece their sheep in a “democracy.”
The number of Yellow Jews, who can masquerade as Mongolians, in China at this time has been variously estimated. Bakony thinks they are not more than 2,000,000, a small fraction of the total population, but we all know that a comparatively small number of Jews will suffice to capture and destroy a nation.
There are only two facts about Communist China that need concern us. As soon as the new Communist régime was securely established, the widow of Sun Yat-sen, the Yellow Jewess Soong Ching-ling, popped up as the second most powerful individual in the country and was probably prevented only by her sex from becoming the actual head. She must have been the figure about whom her fellow tribesmen rallied, and she remained influential until her death, but she was gradually eclipsed by Mao Tse-tung, one of the cleverest of the bandits who flourished in the 1920s. {note 25} Mao’s rise from bandit to ruler is described by George Paloczi-Horvath in Mao Tse-tung, Emperor of the Blue Ants (New York, Doubleday, 1963). The author reads and uses Chinese sources, and although basically hostile to Mao, tries to be objective. He ends his book with the odd suggestion that if the Soviet-American combine were to give Mao a hug and a kiss, he might become a good boy. Many of our would-be intellectuals read Mao’s voluminous writings in English translations and rack their brains in an effort to understand his version of Communist “theory”: they have not discovered that Mao, whatever his race, had the distinctive habits of the Jews and, like them, used words, not to communicate his thoughts, but to conceal them. {end note 25} He had been slowly climbing to the pinnacle of power, which he attained around 1968 and, with some vicissitudes, retained until his death in September 1976. Bakony believes that Mao was a real Chinese, who knew how to use the Jews for his own ultimate purposes.
Despite the racial difference, which precludes any real amity between Mongolians and Slavs, the Communist government of China for years remained on the best of terms with the Communist government of the Soviet, which the United States was constantly shoring up and partly financing, but a rupture occurred not long after the death of Dzhugashvili, alias Stalin. Mao vehemently objected to Khrushchev’s denigration of the dead hero, which, although couched in the usual double-talk of politicians, was largely motivated by the fact that Stalin, near the end of his life, had taken some measures against the Jews in the Soviet, most of which were aborted by his sudden and oddly opportune death. Mao’s opposition was, naturally, expressed in the usual gibberish of politicians, and no one knows to what extent it was motivated by a wish to deal with the Jewish problem in his own country.
Bakony was convinced that Mao’s policy was inimical to the Jews and that the international race would, through the Yellow Jews in China, incite revolts against him. This could be the explanation of several abortive attempts to overthrow him. Bakony wrote before Mao publicly stated that while scattering the blossoms of social justice and brotherhood, he killed 800,000 Chinese. All observers believe that the great man modestly understated his accomplishment, and some estimates of the total number of his victims are as high as 12,000,000. His social engineering certainly gave him an opportunity to solve China’s Jewish problem with the Oriental practicality of which our race seems incapable, but, so far as I know, there is no evidence or even rumor that he took advantage of his golden opportunity. This does not necessarily mean that he did not, for the Jews, although glad to invent all sorts of stories about “exterminations” to defame the Germans, would not want the world to know that the idea had been put into practice anywhere, {note 26} The publication of Professor Butz’s analysis of the “holocaust” swindle, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, naturally caused among the Jews some dissent as to the policy the race should pursue and several rabbis, in their own publications and even in their columns in papers for the goyim, such as the Chicago Sun-Times, issued veiled warnings that too much agitation about their Holohoax might give the Americans ideas they would put into practice. The ruling element in Jewry decided to use their newspapers and boob-tubes to pump a steady stream of sludge in the faces of the dumb brutes; but some intelligent rabbis continued to have misgivings. The Stratford (Connecticut) Express, 23 September 1978, quoted the opinions of two rabbis concerning the slop currently sprayed from the boob-tubes; one said that the film might make people “wonder why Hitler did not complete the job, and it could encourage Fascism to rear its ugly head again”; the other said that the film was “far too contrived… and could encourage Fascism again.” Even the device of ramming the pus into the minds of school children seems to be becoming counter-productive, and one hears that some Jews are coming to feel that they are only advertising their dominion over their American plantation and its livestock. Such dissidents may have been the object of a warning in Jewish Week, 29 April 1979: “The Holocaust is our strength. We have been shielded by it for a generation.” The blatant hoax, however, may prove to be their great and perhaps fatal weakness. {end note 26} while the Chinese would think it inexpedient to shock the tender hearts of the sentimental Aryans. But if Bakony was right in his analysis of the Chinese regime, subsequent events show that Mao missed his chance.
The Polish writer, Louis Bielsky, in another small booklet, Underground Facts of the Arab-Israel and Moscow-Peking Conflicts, agreed with Bakony on all essential points and, writing at about the same time, predicted that the Jews would either “promote a revolt against Mao… or wait patiently for Mao Tse-tung and Chou En-lai to die, so that the crypto-Jews… can again get control of Red China… and transform it again into a satellite of the Jewish-Soviet Union.” One could say that this prediction was verified by subsequent events.
By October 1975, it was obvious that Mao’s health was failing and that his old age would soon reach its inevitable end. The Chief Executive of the United States at that time, Rabbi Kissinger, rushed to China for a conference with Mao and found him still so vigorous that the two barely preserved decorum at the farewell dinner, but Kissinger may have scattered in the right places largesse from the pockets of the Jews’ beasts of burden in the United States. In the following February, observers were astonished that Hua Kuo-fang had pushed himself into the succession to Chou En-lai and was undermining Teng Hsiao-ping, who was believed to have been in line for the succession to Mao. Richard Nixon, who was then playing the role of President in the performances at the White House, was hurriedly sent to China, possibly with another bucket of Americans’ money. In April, Hua booted Teng out of the political heaven, and when Mao at last died in September, Hua jumped up onto the vacated throne.
Children and intellectuals often suppose that politicians have principles, and they were astonished when Teng suddenly returned from outer darkness to become second to Hua. Observers surmised, of course, that the two had made a deal for mutual advantage or, to put it less politely, that Teng had obtained his price for selling out his faction. This was verified at once: that faction, now headed by Chiang Ching, who had been Mrs. Mao No. 5 (if I have counted correctly) and was his widow and had the support of three men who had been close to Mao, attempted a revolt to restore “Mao’s principles.” The revolt was quickly suppressed, and the four leaders were arrested and imprisoned, while the small fry were probably massacred. That was in July 1977, although, oddly enough, Chiang Ching and her confederates were not tried and convicted of “crimes against the state” until January 1981.
Bielsky’s prediction seemed to have been verified. The Jews waited for Mao to die and then took over, and what was more, China and the Soviet, as predicted, appeared to kiss and make up their quarrel. Hua and Teng were said to have become real buddies, and the latter negotiated a treaty with Japan, visited the United States, and was rewarded when the United States rushed to him two billion dollars, euphemistically called “credits,” although every one knows that the two billion will come from the udders of the American milch-cows. More significant was the errand boy who delivered the cash: he was the Vice President, Mondale, commonly known as “the toast of the homosexuals” and thought by many observers likely to succeed Reagan as the Chief actor in White-House shows, since he can be relied upon to make the white boobs cower before perverts as they now cower before niggers. When the milk of American cows is delivered by so great a man, it must be doubly refreshing.
So far, so good. But then we come to the events of September 1981. Children and intellectuals seem never to understand that friendship between powerful politicians is like the amity that prevails between professional gamblers, who play poker with their derringers ready in their sleeves. Somebody — it was said to be Teng — suddenly drew on Hua, who threw down his cards and vamoosed. And then, after a little interlude with a stand-in, Hu Yao-ping appeared as the dealer, and “old China hands,” who know everything, say that he is Teng’s man and, despite some official blarney, will deal from Mao’s old deck. Chinese names are variously rendered in English, and I do not know whether this Hu is the “Hu Y’o” whom a Chinese defector in 1957 identified as the young man most likely to be Mao’s eventual successor, according to Dr. William G. Goddard’s The Story of Chang Lao (Melbourne, Australia, c. 1962).
If Bielsky and Bakony were right when they wrote, and if the “old China hands” are right about Hu Yao-ping now, the Jews have again lost control of China. And if that is so, it is unlikely that China could be used to attack Japan.
But what if they are wrong? What if Hu Yao-ping holds office by permission of the Jews, whose power must depend on the Yellow Jews in China? I do not know, but I doubt that the Chinese could now be mobilized for an attack on Japan. Some observers feel that the suffering of the Chinese since the Americans delivered them to the Communists has almost completely effaced recollection of the bitterness aroused by the Japanese invasion in the 1930s, and that the constant denunciation of Chiang Kai-shek as a “tool of the white imperialists” has shifted the onus of responsibility to him. And there is a more fundamental consideration. All observers are agreed that the Chinese are now more racially conscious than at any time before in their history, and that the internationalism peddled by Sun Yat-sen and the early Communists is now virtually extinct. And if the Chinese have become so conscious and proud of their race as Mongolians, one wonders whether the Yellow Jews will be able to keep up their masquerade. I do not profess to know, but I suspect that although the Yellow Jews seem indistinguishable from Chinese to your eyes, racially conscious Mongolians will smell out the difference. They may not be as stupid and fatuous as Aryans. {note 27} The obtuseness of White men would be incredible, if it were not attested by innumerable examples. The Irish, for example, still venerate the memory of the “great Irish patriot,” Robert Briscoe, and his “heroic part in the Irish revolt [against Britain]” his heroism having consisted of inciting murders and planning riots from a place of safety and of smuggling into Ireland arms and bombs that the Irish purchased at high prices from Jewish dealers. They venerate that hero because their newspapers tell them to, and they do so quite oblivious of the fact that “Briscoe” did not have in his veins a drop of Irish blood, being the offspring of Jews who crawled into the island from Lithuania, either before or after his birth. In March 1957, he strutted through Boston at the head of a procession of Irish, suitably adorned while the band played “Wearing of the Green” and he waved his cane at the cheering crowds of “those dumb Micks,” as he called them when speaking later to a German-American, although the Jew seems to have concealed his contempt for his dupes when he was with them.
We should not think of such stupidity as a peculiarity of the Irish. In his Racial Contours (Douglas, Isle of Man, 1965), H.B. Isherwood, on the basis of his own observations and the latest anthropological data then available, stated that the highest percentage of Nordics was to be found in Sweden, where the Nordic characteristics were more common than in Norway. In my review of Donald Day’s book in the January issue of The Liberty Bell, I commented on his observation of the Swedes. A reader tells me that he recently attended an academic ceremony at the University of Uppsala: he says the University was swarming with Jews and that the Swedes could not tell the difference between a Jew and a Swede — not because they cowered before the Jewish Terror, which would be understandable, but because they were too stupid to perceive a difference between persons who spoke Swedish. He said that he at last understood that the common phrase, “dumb Swede,” did not refer to a person stricken with aphasia or a disease of the vocal chords. The Swedish government has arrested Dietrich Felderer for disrespect to God’s Race and has placed him at the mercy of Jewish “psychiatrists.” Felderer’s crime was to write a book in which he analyzed the hoax called Anne Frank’s Diary, a piece of fiction so carelessly put together that any person who can read it while awake and fail to recognize it as clumsy fiction is so deficient in common sense that he must be considered intellectually subnormal. It would be bad enough if the Swedish authorities who are persecuting Felderer were doing so in expectation of being rewarded with a few dollars by the Jews, but one cannot exclude the horrible thought that some of them may actually believe the silly story told in the hoax. If they do, they probably believe Grimm’s Fairy Tales to be historical records. {end note 27} And if they are not, the Jews’ time in China is limited, regardless of whether or not they now control Hu Yao-ping.
I do not pretend to solve the Chinese puzzle. I have tried only to indicate concisely why it is a puzzle.
